(From my thesis: Enhancing Proficiency in
Communication through Campus Journalism)
Chapter 2
RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the literature and studies
taken from the various sources like books, unfinished thesis and the like. The
presentation starts with the foreign literature, local literature, and then
followed by foreign studies and lastly, the local studies. The synthesis of the
works, data and information which were gathered are included, too.
Foreign Literature
Hargett (1998) as stated by Zara (2008) defined
proficiency as being able to effectively communicate or understand thoughts or
ideas through the language’s grammatical system and its vocabulary, using its
sounds or written symbol. While this may seem simplistic, one can infer that
how educators define proficiency will drive what language proficiency tests
will measure. Obviously, definitions of language proficiency that are
incomplete or unreasonable will distort educators’ perceptions of limited
English proficient students’ abilities and progress.
Huang (2006) stressed that speaking English
outside the classroom and motivation in speaking English were the powerful
predictors of the use of oral communication strategies among the learners.
Thus, the inquiry highlights the importance of functional practice and
intrinsic motivation in the development of proficiency in communication.
Baker and MacIntyre (2000) as stated by Zara
(2008) argue that “It is not the individual’s actual skill that counts; rather
it is how they perceive their communication competence that
will determine WTC” (p.316). Both the willingness to communicate
(WTC) and perceived competence have an impact on the frequency of
communication. However, Cheng (2007) reveals that the CSs used and the
self-report of oral proficiency did not have a statistical relationship. She
points out that “effective communication takes more than the ability to talk.
It also involves the use of one’s mental faculties in the choice of words, the
ability to make other person understand what one is saying and vice versa.”
Alkuino,
(2006) professed journalism as art of expressing different information, which
is significant to the readers, listeners or viewers. It is divided into three
categories: written, oral and visual. It is written if the medium is the
newspaper, magazine and other reading materials; oral if it is through the
radio; and visual if it is through television and movie.
On
the other hand, Bond (2002) as expressed by Zara (2008) perceived that
journalism is something that embraces all forms in which or through which the
news and comments on the news reach the public. All that happens in the world,
if such happenings hold interest for the public, and all the thoughts, actions
and ideas which these happenings stimulate, become basic materials for the
journalist.
Picard (2008) wrote in an essay published in The
Politics of News that Public journalism is nothing more than the conviction
that journalism’s business is about making citizenship work. In practice, there is only the
pioneering, sometimes contradictory work of dozens of very loosely connected
editors and reporters.
Berning (2011) reiterates the narrative
potential of journalistic reportages via a set of narratological categories.
The author spells out minimal criteria for particular types of reportages, and
challenges the argument that journalism and literature have distinct,
non-overlapping communicative goals. By showing that the reportage is a hybrid
text type that seeks to inform, educate, and entertain, this study advances a
re-conceptualization of journalism and literature as two fields with permeable
borders.
Maxwell
(2002) as conveyed by Camacho (2010) in an article in the Alameda Times-Star
wrote: The students need to learn the craft and art of writing. Unfortunately,
most writing-across-the-curriculum programs are too hit-and-miss to inculcate a
love of writing or even an attitude of appreciating the importance of writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment